Cornwall Council (25 027 244)

Category : Education > School transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr F’s complaint about school transport because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr F complains the Council refused his application, and subsequent appeal, for home to school transport for his daughter. He says the Council provides transport to the same school for an older sibling, and for other local children. He thinks the Council’s decision is unfair.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council refused Mr F’s application for home to school transport because his daughter does not attend the nearest suitable school.
  2. Mr F appealed the Council’s decision and explained why he wanted his daughter to attend the school. I have not included the details here to ensure Mr F’s anonymity.
  3. The Council considered Mr F’s appeal but decided the reasons he gave did not justify the Council providing transport. Unhappy with the outcome, Mr F complained to us.
  4. We do not decide whether the Council should provide transport for Mr F’s daughter. Our job is to check the Council followed the relevant legislation, government guidance and Council policies. We cannot question Council decisions taken without fault, no matter how strongly Mr F disagrees. We are not another appeal.
  5. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation by us.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr F’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings