Warwickshire County Council (25 023 712)

Category : Education > School transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to recover money paid to her for her daughter’s home to school transport because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council is seeking to recover more than £9,000 paid to her as a “direct travel payment” to arrange home to school transport for her daughter, G.
  2. Ms X does not believe the Council has the power to reclaim the money, and she thinks the Council’s expectations for her daughter’s school attendance are unreasonable.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council made a “direct travel payment” to Ms X so she could arrange home to school transport for her daughter. Conditions for use of the payment are set out in the Council’s policy and the direct travel payment agreement.
  2. Ms X’s daughter’s school attendance fell below 80%, so the Council decided to recover money it had paid for her school transport on the days she did not attend school. The Council obtained attendance data from the school and calculated the amount owed based on the number of days G had missed.
  3. Ms X objected and complained to the Council. She said she thought the Council’s attendance expectations were unreasonable, and she did not believe the Council had the power to recover the money.
  4. The Council explained its actions with reference to its policy and the agreement signed with Ms X.
  5. Unhappy with the Council’s response, Ms X complained to us.
  6. The Council is seeking to recover money it paid to cover the cost of G’s school transport on days she did not attend school. The Council has explained its decision with reference to its policies and the agreement signed by Ms X. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation by us.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings