Other


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Kent County Council (25 017 740)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 06-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about how the Council made enquiries about his child’s education. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.

  • Newcastle upon Tyne City Council (25 020 529)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 31-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about action taken by the Council regarding Mr X and Ms Y’s child’s school attendance, which led to court action. We will also not investigate the Council’s handling of the matter. This is because an investigation would not lead to a different outcome or achieve anything more. Mr X and Ms Y have also not suffered injustice significant enough to warrant our involvement.

  • Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council (25 019 864)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 27-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the use of a Council lawyer to respond to a complaint. This is because it would not be proportionate to investigate the Council’s complaint-handling when the law prevents us investigating the substantive matter complained of.

  • London Borough of Barking & Dagenham (25 015 357)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 25-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the actions the Council took following the complainant’s son being taken off his school’s roll. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our intervention, and part of the complaint concerns matters which could have been considered in court.

  • Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (25 017 212)

    Statement Upheld Other 24-Mar-2026

    Summary: We have upheld this complaint about how the Council dealt with a grant application. This is because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Mr Y and improving its service for others.

  • London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (25 020 429)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 23-Mar-2026

    Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about what happened in Ms X’s child’s school. The law does not allow us to investigate what happens in schools. Nor will we investigate how the Council responded to Ms X’s concerns about safeguarding, because it is unlikely we would find fault.

  • Kent County Council (25 016 854)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 17-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s duties under the Equality Act 2010 and how it applied statutory guidance to ensure Miss X’s child could attend a funded nursery place. This is because we are unlikely to find fault in the Council’s actions.

  • Newcastle upon Tyne City Council (25 008 888)

    Statement Upheld Other 17-Mar-2026

    Summary: Ms X complained the Council wrongly excluded her child from the Holiday and Activities (HAF) Programme and failed to apply its discretion to allow inclusion as a child in need. The Council confused two schemes and failed to consider Ms X’s child for inclusion in the HAF programme meaning the child missed out on holiday activities and meals. A remedy which includes a distress payment and information on how to apply for the next scheme is agreed.

  • London Borough of Southwark (25 017 380)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 16-Mar-2026

    Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about a Council’s communications with a school the complainant’s child attends. The complaint concerns matters which took place in a school and the law prevents us from considering such complaints.

  • Central Bedfordshire Council (25 017 753)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 16-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council responded to a complaint about governance of a school. It would be disproportionate to investigate the complaint-handling when the law prevents us investigating the substantive matter complained of.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings