Surrey County Council (26 015 828)

Category : Education > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council sharing her child’s personal information externally without good reasons to do so. The Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider this complaint.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council shared her child’s (Y) personal information about their special educational needs, with a third party, without a good reason to do so.
  2. Miss X also complains the Council failed to respond to her complaint about the matter.
  3. Miss X says the matter has caused anxiety and distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), section 34(B))
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  3. We will not usually investigate complaint handling if we are not investigating the rest of the complaint. This is because there is not usually enough injustice to justify us doing so. We collect information about particularly poor complaint handling practice and report this back to organisations. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), section 34B(8))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X complained about the Council sharing Y’s personal data with a third party, without her permission or any good reasons for doing so.
  2. Miss X has a right to complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). Parliament set up the ICO to consider data protection disputes. This includes where a person believes their information has been shared unlawfully.
  3. For this reason, we will not investigate this complaint. The ICO is better placed to consider it.
  4. As we will not investigate the substantive matters of the complaint, we will not investigate the Council’s handling of the complaint because it is not proportionate to do so.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because the Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings