Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council (22 016 306)

Category : Education > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Mar 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint the Council’s Children’s Social Care assessment was flawed as it failed to properly consider parental alienation. The assessment was considered as part of court proceedings therefore we have no jurisdiction to investigate.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained the Council failed to properly consider her concerns about parental alienation its Children’s Social Care assessment. She said the Council’s assessment did not represent her or her children’s views and that the Council had failed to investigate why her children did not want contact with her. She said the Council had not recognised she was a victim of domestic abuse. Ms X wants the Council to complete a further assessment.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  3. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s Children’s Social Care assessment. The Council’s assessment was considered as part of court proceedings around living arrangements and Ms X’s contact with her children. We cannot investigate what happened in court, that includes where assessments have been used as part of court proceedings. Although Ms X is unhappy with the content of the Council’s assessment we have no jurisdiction to investigate this complaint.
  2. Following the Court outcome, Ms X has sent further referrals to the Council around parental alienation. The Council said it has considered the information she has provided but the threshold is not met for a further assessment. It said the family is being supported by its Early Help Service. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s assessment because it was considered as part of court proceedings therefore we have no jurisdiction to investigate.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings