Birmingham City Council (25 004 376)

Category : Education > Alternative provision

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council not providing alternative educational provision to Miss X’s child. This is because the injustice she claims stems from actions taken by the school, and there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains her daughter’s school failed to provide alternative educational provision when she had low attendance, and failed to properly safeguard her.
  2. Miss X says the school should have made alternative provision, counselling and applied for an Education, Health and Care Plan while her child had better attendance, instead of letting it fall.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. We cannot investigate most complaints about what happens in schools. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5, paragraph 5(2), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X’s complaints mostly focus on the actions of her daughter’s school, rather than the Council. We have no power to investigate the school’s actions as set out at paragraph five.
  2. While we can investigate complaints about local councils there is no evidence the Council was aware of the issues with the school until Miss X complained. Now it is aware it has asked Miss X to provide further medical evidence about the reasons for her daughter’s non-attendance to the school. The school may then make a referral to the Council for alternative educational provision and the Council will consider what it needs to do.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to justify investigating, and there is no more we can achieve for Miss X while the referral process is ongoing.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings