Dorset Council (24 018 781)

Category : Education > Alternative provision

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council has failed to make educational provision for the complainant’s son. There is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council’s part to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Miss X, complains that the Council has failed to make educational provision for her son while he has not been attending school.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X’s son has special educational needs and an Education Health and Care plan. She says he has been out of school for fifteen months and throughout that period the Council has failed to make arrangements for him to receive educational provision.
  2. In response to Miss X’s complaint, the Council says that provision has been available to her son at his school throughout the period. While it recognises the difficulties Miss X has with having her son at home, it says it has confirmed that the school has offered to make arrangements to assist him to return.
  3. The Council also says it has accepted that Miss X’s son may benefit from a specialist education placement, and it began consultations with possible placements in October 2024. It has apologised that this process has been subject to delay, but says that it has made extra funding available to the school to offer appropriate provision for Miss X’s son while a specialist placement is identified.
  4. The Ombudsman will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council’s part to warrant our intervention. The correspondence indicates that, despite the delay in consulting specialist placements, educational provision has been available to Miss X’s son throughout the period at the school where he remains on roll. There is no evidence that he has missed out on educational provision due to fault on the Council’s part and there are therefore no grounds for us to intervene.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council’s part.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings