Shropshire Council (23 011 046)

Category : Education > Alternative provision

Decision : Not upheld

Decision date : 28 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr F complains his son, B, has been out of school for two and a half years and the Council has refused to make alternative arrangements for his education. I have discontinued my investigation as the Council has now begun legal proceedings against Mr F in respect of B’s non-attendance.

The complaint

  1. Mr F complains his son, B, has been out of school for two and a half years and the Council has refused to make alternative arrangements for his education.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’.
  2. We may decide not to continue with an investigation if we think the issues raised could reasonably be mentioned as part of legal proceedings regarding a closely related matter. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered information provided by Mr F and the Council. I invited Mr F and the Council to comment on my draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr F’s son, B, has not attended school since autumn 2021.
  2. Mr F asked the Council to make alternative arrangements for B’s education. The Council refused.
  3. Mr F complained to the Council. The Council responded at both stages of its complaints procedure. The Council did not uphold his complaint.
  4. The Council’s final complaint response said the Council was considering court proceedings against Mr F in respect of B’s non-attendance.
  5. Unhappy with the Council’s response, Mr F complained to the Ombudsman.
  6. I understand proceedings have now begun.
  7. Whether B should attend school, or whether the Council should make alternative arrangements, are different ways of looking at the same problem. The Court will decide whether B should attend school.
  8. Mr F can mention in Court why he believes the Council should make alternative arrangements for B’s education. It is important that Mr F gives all his attention to the prosecution. The Court takes precedence.
  9. I will not, therefore, continue with my investigation.
  10. Mr F may make a new complaint to the Ombudsman once proceedings have concluded. If he does, we will have to re-consider whether we are able to investigate in light of the judgement.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have discontinued my investigation as the Council has now begun legal proceedings against Mr F.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings