Leicestershire County Council (26 013 650)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 02 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We have upheld Miss X’s complaint because the Council delayed considering this at stage two of the Children’s Statutory Complaints process. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Miss X.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council delayed considering her complaint at stage two of the Statutory Children’s Complaints Procedure. She says this has caused frustration and uncertainty.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)
  2. Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In January 2026, Miss X asked the Council to escalate her complaint to stage two of the statutory children’s complaints procedure. The entire stage two process should take no more than 65 working days. The Council should have completed the stage 2 process by April 2026. Miss X brought her complaint to the Ombudsman in August 2026 because she had not received a response from the Council.
  2. Since Miss X brought her complaint to the Ombudsman, the Council has sent its stage two response to her.
  3. If we were to investigate this complaint it is likely we would find the Council at fault. This is because there has been a four-month delay in the Council issuing Miss X with a stage two response. This has caused frustration and avoidable distress to Miss X.
  4. We therefore asked the Council to apologise to Miss X for the delay and offer to make a payment to her of £200 to remedy the avoidable distress and time and trouble she has been put to in pursuing her complaint.
  5. To its credit, the Council agreed to resolve the complaint and has agreed with our recommendation. The Council has agreed to provide the remedy within four weeks of this decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld this complaint because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Miss X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings