London Borough of Islington (26 008 129)
Category : Children's care services > Other
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 07 Aug 2026
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the actions of the Council in seeking a supervision order. This is because the complaint concerns evidence placed before a court and the law prevents us from investigating such matters.
The complaint
- The complainant, Mr X, complains that the Council has been at fault in the course of its application for a supervision order.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Mr X’s daughter has been the subject of legal proceedings. The Council has obtained an interim supervision order and has applied for a supervision order. Mr X complains that there has been procedural fault in the Council’s application for the supervision order and that it has been discriminatory in the submission of evidence.
- The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint because it involves evidence and matters considered by a court. By law, we cannot consider what happens in court. This applies to any fault in the submission of evidence. If Mr X has concerns about the Council’s actions, he may raise them with the court during the proceedings.
Final decision
- We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because it concerns matters considered by a court.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman