Newcastle upon Tyne City Council (26 006 901)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of the children’s statutory complaints procedure. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council refused to consider her complaint at stage two of the children’s statutory complaints procedure.
  2. Ms X says this caused distress and prevented independent scrutiny of her complaint.
  3. Ms X wants the Council to consider each of her points of complaint to decide which parts are unlikely to prejudice the concurrent court proceedings and then start the stage two complaint investigation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The law sets out a three-stage procedure for councils to follow when looking at complaints about children’s social care services. The accompanying statutory guidance, ‘Getting the Best from Complaints’, explains councils’ responsibilities in more detail. We also published practitioner guidance on the procedures, setting out our expectations.
  2. Ms X asked the Council to investigate her complaint at stage two of the children’s statutory complaints procedure. The Council refused due to there being concurrent court proceedings.
  3. Councils can refuse to consider a complaint if a complainant says they intend to take legal action or if investigating a complaint could prejudice concurrent court proceedings. However, after the proceedings have ended, a complainant can resubmit the complaint for the council to consider.
  4. We will not investigate this complaint. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision not to consider Ms X’s statutory children’s complaint at stage two because of the concurrent court proceedings.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings