Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council (25 024 339)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council’s social workers prepared inaccurate and biased court reports and committed data breaches. We cannot investigate matters that were considered in court. His concerns about data breaches are better placed with the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council’s social workers prepared court reports that were biased and contained inaccurate and damaging information. He also believes the social workers committed data breaches.
  2. Mr X says the matter has caused him distress. He wants the reports corrected and for the Council to retrain its staff.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The law prevents us from investigating reports that were considered in court. This means we also cannot consider the social worker’s actions in preparing the reports, including any allegations of bias, unprofessional behaviour or any alleged inaccuracies contained in the reports. It was open to Mr X to raise such concerns during the court proceedings. Therefore, I cannot investigate.
  2. The law also says we may not investigate if we consider another body is better placed to consider the complaint. Mr X’s concerns about alleged data breaches and rectification of records are better placed with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). The ICO is the independent regulatory body responsible for upholding data privacy and personal information and is better placed to consider complaints about this. Therefore, I will also not investigate this aspect of Mr X’s complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaints because we cannot investigate matters that were considered in court and because the ICO is better placed to consider his data concerns.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings