What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Slough Borough Council (25 023 777)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 02 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We have upheld Mr X’s complaint about delay at stage two of the children’s statutory complaints procedure. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council delayed its response to stage two of his children’s statutory complaint.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)
  2. Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X escalated his complaint to stage two of the children’s statutory complaints procedure on 21 January 2026 but the statement of complaint was not agreed until 27 April 2026.
  2. In response to our enquiries the Council said the delay was due to the withdrawal of the investigation team and the need to reallocate. It said the investigation was currently in progress and it would aim to provide the stage two response by 15 June 2026.
  3. If we investigated this complaint it is likely we would find the Council at fault because this is outside of the 65-working day statutory timescale. The delay is likely to have caused Mr X frustration and distress.
  4. We therefore asked the Council to consider remedying the injustice caused by carrying out the following actions within one month of the final decision:
    • Send Mr X the stage two response;
    • Ensure Mr X is given appropriate information about the next steps available to him including the stage three panel when the stage two process has been completed;
    • Pay Mr X a symbolic remedy for frustration and distress of £100, being £50 per month for each month of delay.

Back to top

Agreed action

  1. To its credit the Council agreed to resolve the complaint and it will complete the actions at paragraph 9 within one month, to put things right.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld Mr X’s complaint. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings