London Borough of Camden (25 023 675)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council's handling of arrangements for her child’s short breaks provision. Any injustice is not significant enough to warrant our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains about the Council’s handling of the arrangements for her child’s short breaks provision. She says a failure to sufficiently plan in advance is causing distress and uncertainty. She also complains about poor complaints handling. She wants the Council to improve its processes and confirm forward bookings with her ahead of time.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. Although the Council has acknowledged a communication error with the service provider regarding the arrangements for Ms X’s child, the Council rectified its error to ensure the service was in place. Ms X’s child received the short breaks provision. There is not enough outstanding injustice to warrant our involvement.
  2. Ms X also complains about the Council’s complaints handling. We will not investigate this as it is not a proportionate use of our resources to consider complaints handling where we decide not to investigate the substantive matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough outstanding injustice to warrant our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings