London Borough of Newham (25 022 046)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 20 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about poor communication from the Council and a delay in responding to her complaint. We are satisfied with the actions the Council has taken, and we consider them to be a reasonable and proportionate remedy.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains about poor communication from the Council in relation to child contact arrangements. She said on one occasion, her father drove a considerable distance to attend a contact session that had already been cancelled.
  2. Miss X also complains the Council delayed responding to her complaint.
  3. She would like compensation for the distress caused by the Council’s actions, and compensation for the travel costs her father incurred. She would also like the Council to formally apologise and improve future communications.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because we are satisfied with the actions the Council has taken in response to her concerns, and we consider them to be a reasonable and proportionate remedy.
  2. The Council has accepted its communication failures, apologised to Miss X and partially upheld her complaint.
  3. It offered her a symbolic payment of £50 for the poor communication that led to her father incurring financial losses, and another £50 to recognise the delay in responding to her complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because we are satisfied with the actions the Council has taken, and we consider them to be a reasonable and proportionate remedy.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings