West Berkshire Council (25 019 149)
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about children services’ actions. We have upheld Mr X’s complaint as the Council has now agreed to follow the Children Act statutory complaints’ procedure which is a proportionate way to resolve the complaint.
The complaint
- Mr X complains about Children Services’ actions.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We cannot investigate most complaints about what happens in schools. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5, paragraph 5(2), as amended)
- The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint unless we are satisfied the organisation knows about the complaint and has had an opportunity to investigate and reply. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to notify the organisation of the complaint and give it an opportunity to investigate and reply. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(5), section 34(B)6)
- We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions a council has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)
- Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
Background procedure
- The law sets out a three-stage procedure for councils to follow when looking at complaints about children’s social care services. The accompanying statutory guidance, Getting the Best from Complaints, explains councils’ responsibilities in more detail.
- The first stage of the procedure is local resolution. Councils have up to 20 working days to respond.
- If a complainant is not happy with a council’s stage one response, they can ask that it is considered at stage two. At this stage of the procedure, councils appoint an investigator and an independent person who is responsible for overseeing the investigation. Councils have up to 13 weeks to complete stage two of the process from the date of request.
- If a complainant is unhappy with the result of the stage two investigation, they can ask for a stage three review by an independent panel. The Council must hold the panel within 30 days of the date of request, and then issue a final response within 20 days of the panel hearing.
This case’s events
- Mr X complains about children services’ actions. His complaint includes matters involved in Court proceedings but also that the Council failed to provide support, failed to keep to a child in need plan and then closed the case when they still needed support. Mr X complained in April 2025. The Council replied in its corporate complaints’ procedure. The stage two being in March 2026.
- If we were to investigate it is likely we would find fault causing the complainant injustice because the child in need matters should be replied to within the Children Act statutory complaints procedure.
Agreed action
- The Council has agreed to:
- Complete stage two of the Children Act statutory complaints procedure within the Regulations and notify Mr X of his rights under the procedure.
Final decision
- We have upheld this complaint because we asked the Council to remedy the injustice caused by not using the right complaints’ procedure and it has agreed a proportionate remedy for Mr X.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman