What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Stoke-on-Trent City Council (25 016 627)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s concerns about his child’s foster care. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s handling to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of his concerns about a foster carer involved with his child. Mr X says this has affected his mental health and caused frustration.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council that his son, Y, was neglected and assaulted while in a former foster care placement.
  2. The Council acted on Mr X’s safeguarding concerns, working with the foster carers, Mr X and Y. While Mr X is dissatisfied with the Council’s actions, records show it carried out enquiries and acted accordingly and proportionately to the information available. The Council was not at fault for taking Y’s wishes into consideration.
  3. There is nothing to suggest procedural fault that would enable us to question the professional judgement of the social workers or their managers. In the absence of this we cannot question the conclusions the Council reached in response to Mr X’s concerns.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant our investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings