Suffolk County Council (25 015 412)
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about children services’ actions. We have upheld Mrs X’s complaint as the Council has now agreed to follow the Children Act statutory complaints’ procedure which is a proportionate way to resolve the complaint.
The complaint
- Mrs X complains about Children Services actions.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We cannot investigate most complaints about what happens in schools. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5, paragraph 5(2), as amended)
- The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint unless we are satisfied the organisation knows about the complaint and has had an opportunity to investigate and reply. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to notify the organisation of the complaint and give it an opportunity to investigate and reply. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(5), section 34(B)6)
- We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions a council has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)
- Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
Background procedure
- The law sets out a three-stage procedure for councils to follow when looking at complaints about children’s social care services. The accompanying statutory guidance, Getting the Best from Complaints, explains councils’ responsibilities in more detail.
- The first stage of the procedure is local resolution. Councils have up to 20 working days to respond.
- If a complainant is not happy with a council’s stage one response, they can ask that it is considered at stage two. At this stage of the procedure, councils appoint an investigator and an independent person who is responsible for overseeing the investigation. Councils have up to 13 weeks to complete stage two of the process from the date of request.
- If a complainant is unhappy with the result of the stage two investigation, they can ask for a stage three review by an independent panel. The Council must hold the panel within 30 days of the date of request, and then issue a final response within 20 days of the panel hearing.
This case’s events
- Mrs X complains the Council has failed to reply to her children services’ complaints. The Council accepted part of her complaint as a Children Act statutory complaint at stage two in July 2025.
- If we were to investigate it is likely we would find fault causing the complainant injustice because the Council has failed to reply to the Children Act statutory complaint within the Regulations’ timescale.
Agreed action
- The Council has agreed to:
- Complete stage two of the Children Act statutory complaints’ procedure within 65 working days of the date of this final decision.
- Notify Mrs X of her rights under the procedure at the end of stage two.
Final decision
- We have upheld this complaint because we asked the Council to remedy the injustice caused by not using the right complaints’ procedure and it has agreed a proportionate remedy for Mrs X.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman