Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (25 011 420)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s involvement with Mr X and his family and a Council social worker’s conduct. This is because further investigation would be unlikely to result in a different outcome for him.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained a Council social worker has lied to him. He also complained the Council considers him a risk to his children but will not explain why.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained that a Council social worker lied to him multiple times. He said that when he provided evidence of this to the Council it did not address the problem. He further complained the Council considers him a risk to his children but will not explain why.
  2. The Council explained that it was limited in what it could tell him because he does not hold parental responsibility for his children. The Council explained the social worker’s actions and did not uphold his complaint regarding the social worker being dishonest. The Council told Mr X to make a subject access request if he wished to know what records are held about him.
  3. Mr X wants us to find the Council at fault. The evidence shows the Council has investigated Mr X’s complaint points and explained its actions and the actions of its social worker. The Council has also spoken with Mr X directly about this matter and advised him in the manner we would expect. The Ombudsman will not investigate matters where it is unable to make a significant difference. The evidence shows the Council’s investigation was thorough. Further investigation would be unlikely to result in a different outcome for Mr X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because further investigation would be unlikely to result in a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings