What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Royal Borough of Greenwich (25 010 406)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about a data breach because she has reported it to the Information Commissioner’s Office. The Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed than us to investigate her complaint. It is reasonable to expect Ms X to ask the courts to consider a claim for compensation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council did not properly redact her information in a report it sent to her former husband. She said he was therefore able see sensitive information about her.
  2. She would like the Council to apologise and offer her a financial remedy for the harm and distress caused by the data breach.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complains the Council did not properly redact her information in a report it sent to her former husband.
  2. However, Ms X recently reported the data breach to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). She said she is now waiting for a response.
  3. Ms X said she would like a financial remedy from the Council. Ms X may go to court to claim compensation for any harm or distress caused by the data breach.
  4. If Ms X decided to pursue legal action, she could ask the court to consider reimbursing her costs.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because she has reported the data breach to the ICO. It is open to Ms X to claim compensation through the courts.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings