Surrey County Council (25 009 988)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s action in response to a safeguarding referral about a private school. We are unlikely to find any significant Council fault in its actions which has caused Mrs X an injustice.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X says the Council failed to properly consider her safeguarding referrals about School Y.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X’s child, B, attended private School Y. B has an Education Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan) which is maintained by another council.
  2. Mrs X reported to the Council that School Y had not in her view adequately kept B safe.
  3. The Council said the Independent Schools’ Inspectorate had carried out an inspection and made recommendations. It says the Council’s school relations team visited School Y and discussed the concerns with the head teacher. It says Mrs X’s concerns do not qualify for a Local Authority Designated Officer’s (LADO) involvement.
  4. We are unlikely to find significant Council fault which has caused Mrs X any personal injustice. The Council gained suitable information to decide whether the LADO should be involved. Its decision it should not is a judgment call it is entitled to make. School Y is a private school. And the school’s inspectorate has been involved.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault which has caused Mrs X any personal injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings