London Borough of Hillingdon (25 007 916)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about nursery charges. It is unlikely we would find fault which caused Mr X to be wrongly charged.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says that the Council failed to take action against a nursery for its overcharging.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating; or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X which includes the Council’s repo.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council in April 2025 about the nursery charges his children attended. He also says he contacted the Council in September 2024 about this.
  2. The Council says it carried out a routine audit in August 2024. Following this audit the Council told the nursery its charges were not in line with the Code and asked it to change it. The nursery did so and told the Council it had carried out all action by the end of October 2024.
  3. Mr X says the nursery has reimbursed him for charges from April 2024 to August 2024 but not for before then. We understand the nursery had changed its charging system in April 2024.
  4. In reply to his complaint, the Council said it could not get involved in a dispute about the earlier charges. It said the nursery information about those charges was not transparent enough for it to make a decision.

Analysis

  1. The Council’s responsibility starts at the point it is notified the childcare provider may be charging for free hours wrongly. Here the Council acted before Mr X contacted it. We will not therefore investigate this complaint as it is unlikely we would find fault.
  2. If Mr X wishes to pursue the extra fees paid to the nursery before he complained to the Council, he would need to take action with the nursery provider directly.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find Council fault which caused him to be wrongly charged.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings