Kent County Council (25 006 109)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 21 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We have upheld this complaint because the Council did not complete the statutory children’s complaint’s procedure. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint by providing a remedy for the injustice this caused.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the social services did not provide any support to his son who was on a child in need plan.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint unless we are satisfied the organisation knows about the complaint and has had an opportunity to investigate and reply. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to notify the organisation of the complaint and give it an opportunity to investigate and reply. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(5), section 34(B)6)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council is considering Mr X’s complaint under the statutory procedure for children’s complaints. Mr X asked the Council to escalate his complaint, but the Council refused stating that further consideration would not change the outcome of the stage two investigation.
  2. If we were to investigate Mr X’s complaint, it is likely that we would find fault. This is because the issues raised are ones that should be considered under the statutory procedure, and the reason for refusing to escalate was not a valid one.
  3. I have therefore asked the Council to escalate the complaint to stage three of the statutory complaint’s procedure and apologise to Mr X within one month for not doing so sooner. To its credit, the Council agreed.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld this complaint because the Council did not complete the statutory complaint’s procedure. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint by providing a remedy for the injustice this caused.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings