North Yorkshire Council (24 021 685)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s actions in relation to her child’s social care. This is because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. Additionally, the Information Commissioner’s Office is best placed to consider her concerns about record keeping.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about the Council’s communication regarding her child’s social care. Mrs X also complained that the Council have inaccurate records.
  2. Mrs X complained she has lost her relationship with her child and is grieving.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained about the Council’s communication regarding her child’s social care.
  2. The Council responded via their corporate complaint process and upheld the elements of Mrs X’s complaint regarding communication. The Council provided an explanation for its actions and acknowledged learning. Therefore, a further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.
  3. Mrs X also complained about the Council’s record keeping. This part of Mrs X’s complaint would be best considered by the Information Commissioners Office (ICO). The ICO is a body set up to consider complaints about data matters, including rectification, and so is best placed to consider it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. Additionally, the Information Commissioner’s Office is best placed to consider her concerns about record keeping.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings