London Borough of Bexley (24 020 346)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council not providing financial support for a young person who declined to leave a supported living placement, which Miss X said led to her organisation incurring a significant financial cost. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council declining to pay Miss X’s organisation to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Miss X said the Council abandoned a young person who refused to leave a supported living placement, causing her organisation to incur significant unpaid costs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Young persons in supported living placements are expected to leave at some point after their 18th birthday, though the placements can be extended, as this one was. The Council would have had a homelessness duty to the young person had Miss X’s organisation served notice on them to leave. In its response to Miss X’s complaint, which she provided, it confirmed this. I would also expect the organisation to be aware of this duty. The Council would not have had a duty to continue payments to Miss X’s organisation if it allowed the young person to overstay.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our further involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings