Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about children services’ actions. We have upheld Mr X’s complaint as the Council has now agreed to follow the Children Act statutory complaints’ procedure.

The complaint

1. Mr X, says the Council failed to properly reply to his children services’ complaint.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions a council has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

3. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
4. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

Background procedure

5. The law sets out a three-stage procedure for councils to follow when looking at complaints about children’s social care services. The accompanying statutory guidance, Getting the Best from Complaints, explains councils’ responsibilities in more detail.
6. The first stage of the procedure is local resolution. Councils have up to 20 working days to respond.
7. If a complainant is not happy with a council’s stage one response, they can ask that it is considered at stage two. At this stage of the procedure, councils appoint an investigator and an independent person who is responsible for overseeing the investigation. Councils have up to 13 weeks to complete stage two of the process from the date of request.
8. If a complainant is unhappy with the result of the stage two investigation, they can ask for a stage three review by an independent panel. The Council must hold the panel within 30 days of the date of request, and then issue a final response within 20 days of the panel hearing.

This case events

9. Mr X complained the Council’s children services team closed its case for support of their family for B (born 2012). He complained in May 2024. They feel the family still met the threshold for child in need. They say the Council failed to work with other agencies to act in the best interest of B and safeguard B. The Council replied to his complaint about this in July 2024. It partially upheld the complaint.
10. If we were to investigate it is likely we would find fault causing the complainant injustice because the Council has failed to comply with the Children Act statutory complaints procedure regulations. This complaint should have been offered a Children Act statutory complaints’ procedure Stage Two investigation.

Back to top

Agreed action

11. The Council has agreed to:
• Complete a Children Act statutory complaints’ procedure stage two within 65 workings days of our final decision and inform Mr X of their rights under the procedure when it replies at stage two.

Back to top

Final decision

12. We have upheld this complaint because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Mr X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman