City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (24 009 930)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 25 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint that the Council delayed in responding to her complaint at stage two of the children’s statutory complaints procedure. This is because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Miss X.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council delayed in responding to her complaint at stage two of the children’s statutory complaints procedure.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X made a complaint to the Council regarding its treatment of her son. She complains about negligence, lack of cultural awareness, and poor practice in dealing with children and families from diverse backgrounds.
  2. The Children Act 1989 sets out a three-stage procedure for councils to follow when looking at complaints about children’s social care services. This is the children’s statutory complaints procedure.
  3. If we were to investigate, it is likely we would find fault causing Miss X injustice. This is because Miss X asked the Council to escalate her complaint to stage two of the children’s statutory complaints procedure on 2 August. The Council had a maximum of 13 weeks to complete stage two, starting from the date the complainant first requests to escalate. This means the Council should have completed its stage two investigation by 1 November 2024. I am satisfied the ongoing delay will be causing Miss X distress and frustration.
  4. We therefore asked the Council to consider remedying the injustice caused by completing the following:
    • Apologise to Miss X for the delays in responding to her stage two complaint.
    • Complete its stage two investigation without further delay, and within eight weeks of the final decision statement.
    • Pay Miss X £100 to acknowledge the distress caused by the delay. This is £50 for each month of delay. This payment is to be made within four weeks of the final decision.

Back to top

Agreed action

  1. The Council agreed to resolve the complaint and will complete the above to put things right.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld this complaint because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Miss X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings