Isle of Wight Council (23 004 178)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Jul 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to consider Mr X’s complaint about a social worker until court proceedings have concluded. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s decision that it will not investigate the actions of a social worker involved with his family until court proceedings have concluded.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about the actions of a social worker involved with his family. The Council told Mr X it had accepted his complaint under the children’s statutory complaints procedure but the complaint was currently on hold due to ongoing court proceedings.
  2. It told Mr X he could re-submit his complaint for investigation at stage two of the statutory procedure, once court proceedings had concluded.
  3. Regulations governing the children’s statutory complaints procedure set out circumstances when a Council should not consider a complaint or should not continue to do so. Councils have discretion to not consider a complaint where it considers doing so may prejudice concurrent court proceedings. The Council has decided this applies to this case and so has put the complaint on hold.
  4. This decision appears in line with the regulations. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s decision making.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault to justify further investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings