Royal Borough of Greenwich (22 003 528)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Aug 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council changing a looked after child’s bank account. It is unlikely we would recommend any further remedy.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Ms X, says the Council failed to tell her about her child’s bank account changes, and have not treated her as having shared parental responsibility.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X says her child, D, is looked after by the Council under Court Care Order. She says D had a child trust fund bank account at Bank Y, which she paid into. At the end of March 2022 she discovered she could no longer pay into the account. A few weeks later she called the bank to be told the account had been moved to another bank.
  2. Ms X says she then called the Council’s children services team. She says it was two days before an officer called her back to explain what had happened. Ms X complained. The Council replied in early May 2022. It said:
    • It apologised for not giving her prior knowledge of the bank change;
    • She can still pay into the new account, and it provided details to do so;
    • Confirmed she shared parental responsibility;
    • It accepted there had been a two day delay in replying on this issue and said it was not undue delay for the information requested.
  3. The Children Act 1989 confirms that a Care Order means that whilst parental responsibility is shared with a parent, the Council has the power to determine the extent to which the parent can meet their parental responsibility. In practical terms this means the Council can make decisions, like moving bank accounts, without discussing in advance with the parents.
  4. It is unlikely our investigation could achieve more than the Council’s reply. We are unlikely to recommend any further remedy.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because our investigation is unlikely to achieve a significantly different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings