Cambridgeshire County Council (21 007 982)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Oct 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an assessment report written by the Council. This is not warranted by the claimed injustice, and we could not add to the Council’s own investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X said an assessment report the Council wrote was faulty. She said it was not reviewed and was a defamation of character, showing gender bias and stating Mrs X “finds parenting in general anxiety inducing”.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The report about which Mrs X complains contains some tentative opinions, prefaced with “I wonder if…”. Before Mrs X complained to us, the Council accepted the report was sub-standard and agreed to re-write it. Had we investigated and found fault, we would have been unlikely to have recommended more than that.
  2. Defamation of character is a matter for a court, not us.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because this is not warranted by the claimed injustice, and it would be unlikely to add to the Council’s own consideration of the complaint or lead to us recommending further remedy.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings