Luton Borough Council (20 011 261)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Mar 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s actions regarding his daughter. The matters complained of are in part historic and mostly not separable from the matter of her contact and residence. This has been decided by a court and Mr X has a right to return to court it is reasonable to use.

The complaint

  1. Mr X said the Council made poor decisions about the care of his daughter. He said it supported his ex-partner who failed to return his daughter after an overnight stay in July 2016. He also said a core group meeting in November 2016 was badly managed.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  4. The courts have said that where someone has used their right of appeal, reference or review or remedy by way of proceedings in any court of law, the Ombudsman has no jurisdiction to investigate. This is the case even if the appeal did not or could not provide a complete remedy for all the injustice claimed. (R v The Commissioner for Local Administration ex parte PH (1999) EHCA Civ 916)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I read Mr X’s complaint. I gave him an opportunity to comment on a draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. The matters Mr X complains of from 2016 to 2018 are historic. I have seen no evidence why he could not have approached us sooner. Even if that were not so, most of the matters complained of are not separable from the contact and residence arrangements for a child, and the Council’s views about what they should be. These matters have either already been considered by a court, or they are ones where Mr X has a right to go to court it would be reasonable to use.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because:
  • Mr X could have approached us sooner; and
  • Mr X has had and still has a right to go to court it would be reasonable to use.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings