Staffordshire County Council (20 011 081)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Mar 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We should not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the actions of social workers towards him before, during and after a court case concerning his children. These matters are not separable from those which have either been heard in court or where Mr X has a right to return to court it would be reasonable to use.

The complaint

  1. Mr X said social workers ignored information he provided and refused to listen or respond when he complained. He said this left him feeling on edge and anxious. He wanted a better life with his children.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. The courts have said that where someone has used their right of appeal, reference or review or remedy by way of proceedings in any court of law, the Ombudsman has no jurisdiction to investigate. This is the case even if the appeal did not or could not provide a complete remedy for all the injustice claimed. (R v The Commissioner for Local Administration ex parte PH (1999) EHCA Civ 916)
  4. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I read Mr X’s complaint. I invited his comments on a draft decision and considered them.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X’s relationship with his ex-partner ended. He said he provided the social workers with information about harm to his children that they ignored. He told me he was shocked by the social workers’ refusal to listen to him or to respond when he complained about this.
  2. The residence and contact arrangements for Mr X’s children were decided by a court. The reports written by social workers and the opinions they formed would have been before the court.
  3. Mr X’s complaint is about the actions of social workers before, during and after the court process. Mr X’s desired outcome is a better life with his children. These matters are not separable from those heard in court, or where Mr X has a right to go to court it would be reasonable to use.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because we cannot investigate any matters that were before a court and any remaining matters are not separable from those where Mr X has a right to go to court it would be reasonable to use.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings