Birmingham City Council (24 009 277)

Category : Children's care services > Looked after children

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint about her experience as a looked-after child between 2005 and 2010. This is because significant time has passed since and we could not complete a robust investigation of this historic matter.

The complaint

  1. Mrs B complained about her experiences a looked after child between 2005 and 2010. This caused Mrs B to feel neglected and failed.
  2. Mrs B says she is struggling with depression and poor mental health because of the trauma she experienced whilst a looked after child.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a Council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome; and there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.
    (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint as it is late and there is no good reason to exercise discretion.
  2. Mrs B complains about actions that happened in 2005 to 2010. Due to the period that has passed, it would make it difficult gather all evidence and to establish what happened with reasonable confidence. This would make it difficult to reach a sound and meaningful conclusion.
  3. Mrs B says she wants the council to address the failings it made, which have been set out in an independent review completed by the council following her complaint. We would be unable to achieve any additional remedy.

Final Decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because the complaint is late and the events are historic, so we could not complete a sufficient investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings