London Borough of Southwark (25 010 907)

Statement Not upheld Looked after children 12-May-2026

Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed in its duty of care to him while he was a Looked After Child and failed to provide appropriate support when he left care. Mr X says he became a Looked after Child in 1999 and was mistreated by the carers he was placed with. We found there is no evidence of fault in the way the Council carried out the investigation under the statutory complaints procedure. The Council has accepted and acted on the investigations findings and recommendations and we cannot add anything significant to the investigation.

London Borough of Islington (25 019 983)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Looked after children 12-May-2026

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to pay her out of a scheme for previously looked after children as it is unlikely we would find fault. It is reasonable to expect her to apply to Court.

London Borough of Islington (25 003 148)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Looked after children 07-May-2026

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about harm caused from the Council placing him in a children’s home in the 1960s. The Courts are better placed to decide if the Council should compensate Mr X.

Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (25 018 664)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Looked after children 06-May-2026

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s support to Mr X as a care leaver. We could not add to the investigation the Council has already carried out, and further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

London Borough of Southwark (25 025 945)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Looked after children 30-Apr-2026

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to investigate Mr X’s concerns about his care placement. The complaint relates to matters which occurred over 12 months ago, and it is unlikely we would find fault in the Council’s decision, not to consider it.

London Borough of Bromley (25 019 554)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Looked after children 29-Apr-2026

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the financial support provided by the Council to care for her brother because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

London Borough of Newham (25 022 860)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Looked after children 26-Apr-2026

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to consider her complaint about historical allegations of abuse. This is because, given the passage of time, we do not consider there is a realistic prospect of reaching a sound, fair and meaningful decision.

London Borough of Bexley (25 018 551)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Looked after children 26-Apr-2026

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions relating to a Looked After Child. The Council has already investigated X’s complaint under the three-stage Children Act 1989 complaint procedure, and it is unlikely we would find fault in the way it conducted that investigation or considered the findings. Additionally, any injustice caused by delays in that procedure has already been remedied by the Council’s offer of a symbolic financial remedy.

Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council (25 018 724)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Looked after children 26-Apr-2026

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the care of his grandchildren because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation, and nothing we could add to the Council’s response. We cannot achieve the outcome Mr X wants.

London Borough of Harrow (25 018 483)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Looked after children 23-Apr-2026

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about his claim the Council failed to provide leaving care support. The events are more than six years old and there are no good reasons the late complaint rule should not apply.