City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (22 013 324)

Category : Children's care services > Looked after children

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Feb 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council refusing to investigate Mrs X’s complaint further. There is not enough evidence of fault in the substantive matter complained of to warrant investigation by us of that, or the Council’s handling of a complaint about it.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X said the Council wrongly refused to investigate further her complaint about a decision it made. This decision was not to carry out a viability assessment for her as a possible foster carer for a child to whom she was not related after a foster placement for the child failed.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. When a child requires foster care, councils must consider family members first as potential carers. If no family member is a potential kinship carer, they look to find a qualified foster carer. Although Mrs X is well acquainted with the child, she is not a family member or a qualified foster carer. Thus, it would not be fault for the Council to decline to carry out a viability assessment for her as a potential foster carer for the child. Where we would not find fault with a council’s actions in a substantive matter, we do not find fault with it for declining to continue with a complaint about that matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault in the substantive matter underlying the complaint to warrant investigation. It would not be a good use of public money to investigate the Council’s handling of a complaint about a matter we would not investigate ourselves.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings