Hertfordshire County Council (21 013 135)

Category : Children's care services > Looked after children

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the services provided to a young person looked after by the Council. This is because the complainant has started court action.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr B, complains that the Council has failed to give him an appropriate level of service while he has been in its care.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. The courts have said that where someone has used their right of appeal, reference or review or remedy by way of proceedings in any court of law, the Ombudsman has no jurisdiction to investigate. This is the case even if the appeal did not or could not provide a complete remedy for all the injustice claimed. (R v The Commissioner for Local Administration ex parte PH (1999) EHCA Civ 916)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr B has been in the Council’s care since 2017. He is due to leave care in 2022. He complains that the Council is at fault in failing to make reasonable arrangements for when he leaves care. Specifically, he complains that the Council has not produced an appropriate Pathway Plan.
  2. Mr B further complains that the Council failed to make appropriate educational provision for him during his time in its care, and that this has negatively affected his educational achievement.
  3. The evidence Mr B’s mother has provided on his behalf shows that both areas of complaint have been the subject of applications to the Court. Mr B and has mother applied for a Judicial Review of the Council’s alleged failure to plan for when he leaves care. The Judge refused the application. The evidence also shows that the issues around Mr B’s education are the subject of an earlier application to Court.
  4. The fact that both areas of complaint have been the subject of court applications places them outside the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction, and we cannot investigate them. This is the case even though the Judge refused the Judicial Review application. By law, we cannot investigate where legal action has been initiated, whether or not the matter proceeded past the application stage and was ultimately aired in Court. There is no discretion available to us on this point. We cannot intervene.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr B’s complain because he has started court action on the matters about which he complains.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings