Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (19 012 191)

Category : Children's care services > Friends and family carers

Decision : Not upheld

Decision date : 29 Jul 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We have discontinued our investigation into Mr and
Mrs B’s complaint because the issues they complain about have not yet been fully addressed by the Council. The Council is currently considering its stage 2 response to their complaint, and it would be reasonable to allow it the opportunity to investigate and reply.

The complaint

  1. The complainants, whom I refer to as Mr and Mrs B, complain about the Council’s social work involvement with their grandchildren (for whom Mr and Mrs B were also primary carers until October 2019).

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint unless we are satisfied the council knows about the complaint and has had an opportunity to investigate and reply. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to notify the council of the complaint and give it an opportunity to investigate and reply (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(5))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information from Mr and Mrs B and the Council.
  2. Mr and Mrs B and the Council had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision. I considered any comments received before making a final decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr and Mrs B originally complained to the Ombudsman in 2017. Among other things, they said they were unhappy because their grandchildren had had eight social workers since the Council began its involvement with the family.
  2. The Council acknowledged some failures and apologised, although it noted that it had little control over when its members of staff left their jobs. Mr and Mrs B did not seek to continue the complaint at that point.
  3. Mr and Mrs B made a further complaint in October 2019. They complained, again, about the number of social workers their grandchildren had been allocated. They also made complaints about how the Council managed their grandchildren’s return to their mother’s care (after the children had lived with Mr and Mrs B for several years).
  4. The Council responded at stage 1 of its corporate complaints procedure, and explained its actions. Mr and Mrs B were dissatisfied with this response; however, the Council initially refused to progress their complaint to stage 2 of its procedure, so they approached the Ombudsman.
  5. Since that point, Mr and Mrs B have communicated further with the Council, and it has agreed to consider the matter at stage 2 of its complaints procedure and to respond.
  6. Given that the Council still intends to answer Mr and Mrs B’s complaint, and that – in my view – it would be reasonable to allow it the opportunity to do so, I cannot investigate the complaint.
  7. Because of this, I will discontinue my investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have discontinued my investigation. Mr and Mrs B’s complaint has not yet been fully answered by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings