Lincolnshire County Council (24 015 777)

Statement Upheld Friends and family carers 27-Mar-2025

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about children services’ actions. We have upheld Mrs X’s complaint as the Council has now agreed to follow the Children Act statutory complaints’ procedure.

Coventry City Council (22 011 292)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Friends and family carers 13-Mar-2025

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s actions in removing his children and while they were away from his care. A court decided who should care for the children and matters connected with that are ones we are legally prevented from investigating. Data matters are ones the Information Commissioner would be better placed than us to consider. The remaining administrative matters are ones where we could not add to the Council’s own investigation. And we could not achieve Mr X’s desired outcomes by investigating.

Lancashire County Council (24 003 404)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Friends and family carers 04-Mar-2025

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the calculation of a Special Guardianship allowance because Mr X could reasonably have raised his concerns in court.

Devon County Council (24 009 626)

Statement Upheld Friends and family carers 03-Mar-2025

Summary: Miss B complained that the Council had failed refund deductions of child benefit from her Special Guardian Allowance to 2019 when she became a special guardian. We found the Council failed to properly consider whether Miss B’s circumstances merited a backdated payment over a longer period. However, the Council has now offered to make a payment of approximately £6,300, representing the deductions back to 2019. We are satisfied this adequately remedies the injustice to Miss B.

St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council (24 007 341)

Statement Not upheld Friends and family carers 25-Feb-2025

Summary: Mrs X complained that the Council failed to pay her the allowance due to her as a kinship carer. We have found no fault. The Council properly considered the circumstances of the case and made a decision which was consistent with the requirements of government guidance.

Blackburn with Darwen Council (24 004 182)

Statement Upheld Friends and family carers 31-Jan-2025

Summary: The Council failed to properly advise Mr and Mrs B when they took care of their grandchild. It failed to progress an assessment to support a special guardianship order application in good time, or to give clear advice about funding for this. The Council did not handle Mr B’s complaint in line with the statutory complaints process. The Council’s shortcomings have caused Mr and Mrs B distress and uncertainty, and has meant they have missed out on support from the Council. It has made some improvements to its policies and its services, and has offered to backdate financial support. The Council has also agreed to take further action to remedy the injustice.

North Yorkshire Council (24 017 218)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Friends and family carers 30-Jan-2025

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council’s decisions relating to Ms X’s grandchildren. This is because the matter was subject of court proceedings and the law does not allow us to investigate.

Southampton City Council (23 017 741)

Statement Upheld Friends and family carers 28-Jan-2025

Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s administration of his home improvement loan. He said the Council paid the contractor before they completed the necessary works. This meant that Mr X did not have enough money left to hire another contractor to complete his home improvements. Additionally, Mr X said the Council did not communicate with him effectively about his complaints. We found the Council was at fault for sending the money to Mr X’s contractor before checking they had completed the required works. Additionally, we consider there was fault in the Council’s stage two investigation into Mr X’s complaint and overall drift in how the Council progressed Mr X’s case.

Southampton City Council (23 014 153)

Statement Upheld Friends and family carers 14-Jan-2025

Summary: The Council was at fault for the support it offered Mrs B while she privately fostered a child. It delayed her financial support and the child’s support plan. And it failed to do a safeguarding investigation after saying it would. It has agreed to apologise to Mrs B and will pay her a symbolic financial remedy to recognise her injustice. It will also take steps to improve its service.

Cumberland Council (24 005 435)

Statement Upheld Friends and family carers 08-Jan-2025

Summary: The complainant (Mrs X) said the Council failed to comply with the statutory timescales when considering her complaint through the children’s statutory complaint procedure. Mrs X also complained about the unsatisfactory remedies offered by the Council. We found fault with the Council’s delay. The Council agreed an extra remedy of a symbolic payment.