London Borough of Newham (24 023 292)

Category : Children's care services > Friends and family carers

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to backdate a Special Guardianship allowance. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation and investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council are not backdating a Special Guardianship allowance and believes it should be paid from when they first contacted the Council.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In August 2022, Mr X and his wife contacted because they wanted to become special guardians of their grandson.
  2. The Social Worker who carried out the assessment said the Council might backdate the allowance if it had placed the child in their care. The Council later said this was a private family arrangement, not one made by the Council. It apologised for the incorrect advice and offered a remedy payment in recognition of raising expectations.
  3. The final order was granted in 2024. The Council accepted there was a delay in providing the finalised reports and apologised to Mr X. It also agreed a discretionary payment towards legal fees.
  4. I will not investigate this complaint further because there is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council made its decision. There is no duty for the Council to backdate payments to before the special guardianship order was in place. The Council has apologised for raising Mr X’s expectations and offered a financial remedy, further investigation into this element of her complaint would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation and investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings