Blackpool Borough Council (25 017 029)

Category : Children's care services > Fostering

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s safeguarding concerns for his siblings. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says the Council failed to protect his younger siblings from abuse and neglect in their home. He says the Council ignored what the young people reported and tried to return them to a place where they felt unsafe. He also says social services keep slandering him because they still treat him as a danger due to a false allegation made ten years ago that ended with no further action.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council raising concerns about the care and welfare of his siblings.
  2. The Council told Mr X it had noted his concerns to the relevant officers.
  3. The Council said it could not share information with Mr X because he does not have parental responsibility for his siblings. It can only consider complaints from someone who holds parental responsibility.
  4. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision to refuse his complaint because he does not have parental responsibility. The Council acted in line with statutory guidance on handling children’s services complaints.
  5. The same restriction applies to this office. We can only consider the substantive issues with the consent of someone who has parental responsibility for the children.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings