Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

City of Wolverhampton Council (21 008 835)

Category : Children's care services > Fostering

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 08 Dec 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: we discontinued our investigation into Mrs X’s complaint that the Council did not offer her suitable fostering placements for a year. Mrs X also complained the Council failed to communicate with her when a child placed in her care went missing. The Council has offered a remedy which Mrs X has accepted, and the other part of her complaint is late.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained a looked after child went missing from her care in July 2020 and the Council did not contact her to provide an update for four days, which caused her anxiety and distress. Mrs X says since then the Council failed to follow its policies about arranging suitable placements, so she has lost her carer’s salary.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. If there has been fault which has caused an injustice, we may suggest a remedy. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1) and 26A(1), as amended).
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended).
  3. We can decide whether to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have discussed the complaint with the complainant and considered the complaint and the copy correspondence provided by the complainant. I have considered the documents the Council provided. Mrs X and the Council had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision. I considered their comments before making a final decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mrs X complained that the Council failed to offer suitable child placements, in accordance with its policies for a year from June 2020. Offers were made, but Mrs X said the Council did not ensure all the placements were properly matched. These issues were ongoing when Mrs X complained to the Council in July 2021, so we do not consider this part of the complaint to be late.
  2. The Council responded to Mrs X’s complaint, and it has now offered a remedy which Mrs X has accepted.
  3. As the Council has offered a suitable remedy and further investigation will serve no useful purpose, I have discontinued our investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have discontinued my investigation for the reasons I have explained.

Back to top

Parts of the complaint that I did not investigate

  1. I have not investigated Mrs X’s complaint about the actions of the Council in July 2020, when a child she was fostering went missing from her home. Mrs X did not complain to the Council until July 2021, then came to the Ombudsman in September 2021. Therefore, as described at paragraph 3, this part of the complaint is late.
  2. We have discretion to set aside this restriction where we decide there are good reasons. In this case we have decided not to exercise discretion. It was reasonable to expect Mrs X to complain to the Council or to us sooner. Mrs X has not provided good reasons why she did not complain to us within 12 months of knowing about the issue.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page