London Borough of Redbridge (25 028 046)

Category : Children's care services > Disabled children

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms M’s complaint about her application for a Blue Badge for her son because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation. We cannot achieve the outcome Ms M wants, so there is no worthwhile outcome achievable.

The complaint

  1. Ms M complains the Council refused her application for a Blue Badge for her son.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We do not decide whether the Council should give Ms M’s son a Blue Badge. This is the Council’s job. Our role is to check the Council followed relevant legislation, Government guidance and Council policies. We check the Council took account of evidence and its decision-making process was fair. We are not another appeal. We cannot question a Council decision made without fault, no matter how strongly Ms M disagrees.
  2. Ms M’s son has autism spectrum disorder and developmental delays. At the time of her application, Ms M’s son was 3.
  3. The Council refused Ms M’s application and subsequent appeal. The Council decided a child of his age would only ever be accompanied by another adult who could mitigate the difficulties he experienced walking to and from the car.
  4. Ms M objected to the Council’s decision. She said “age-based reasoning” was not compatible with Government guidance.
  5. I disagree. Government guidance says councils should assess applications for Blue Badges for children in relation to “common developmental milestones”.
  6. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision making to justify an investigation.
  7. There is, therefore, no worthwhile outcome achievable.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms M’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation. We cannot achieve the outcome Ms M wants, so there is no worthwhile outcome achievable.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings