Disabled children


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Slough Borough Council (18 012 978)

    Statement Upheld Disabled children 23-Aug-2019

    Summary: Mrs X complains about the way the Council has supported her daughter and herself. The Council is at fault as Slough Children's Services Trust delayed in carrying out a carer's assessment. The Trusts refusal to escalate Mrs X's complaint to stage two of the complaints procedure is also fault. These faults have not caused Mrs X a significant injustice.

  • Birmingham City Council (18 013 857)

    Statement Upheld Disabled children 12-Aug-2019

    Summary: The Council is at fault as it did not provide an adequate care package to allow their daughter to be discharged from hospital. As a result Y remained in hospital for two months longer than necessary and missed two months of school. Mrs X was caused distress and avoidable time and trouble. The Council has agreed to remedy this injustice by making payments to Mr and Mrs X and Ms Y and reviewing Y's care package and respite provision.

  • Essex County Council (17 019 893)

    Statement Upheld Disabled children 27-Jun-2019

    Summary: The Ombudsman found fault by the Council in its handling of the Education, Health and Care plan process for a young man with special educational needs, and with the social care support it provided to him. This resulted in unnecessary delays and caused the complainant, who is the young man's mother, avoidable distress and inconvenience. The Council agreed to apologise to the complainant and pay a financial remedy in recognition of the impact this fault had on her and her son. The Council will also take action to prevent similar problems occurring in future.

  • Central Bedfordshire Council (16 002 323)

    Statement Upheld Disabled children 17-Jun-2019

    Summary: The Ombudsmen found fault with the way a CCG managed the Children's Continuing Care process for a child with severe disabilities. They recommended the CCG apologise for this fault and pay the complainants a financial remedy in recognition of the distress this caused them. They also found fault with the Council's delayed assessment of the parents' needs as carers. The Council agreed to apologise to the complainants. The Ombudsmen found no fault with the actions of a Trust involved with the child's care.

  • London Borough of Islington (18 011 162)

    Statement Not upheld Disabled children 29-May-2019

    Summary: Ms X complained the Council failed to provide disabled adaptations for her son, Z, did not take action when she complained her neighbour was abusing Z and failed to provide out of school activities for Z as specified in his Education, Health and Care Plan. There was no fault in the Council's actions.

  • London Borough of Sutton (18 013 226)

    Statement Upheld Disabled children 29-May-2019

    Summary: Miss B complained that the Council failed to pay sufficient compensation for the injustice caused by fault in the way it dealt with provision of support for her son, C. The Council has agreed to pay £3100.

  • London Borough of Sutton (18 011 310)

    Statement Upheld Disabled children 21-May-2019

    Summary: Mrs B complained about the Council's refusal to provide transport for her son to attend short breaks at out-of-borough placement, following a reduction in the opening hours of the in-borough provision. We have found fault with the Council's decision not to pay for the transport and the way in which it dealt with the complaint. The Council has agreed to pay Mrs B £500.

  • Wiltshire Council (18 012 941)

    Statement Upheld Disabled children 14-May-2019

    Summary: Mrs P complained the Council failed to offer her family sufficient respite. At the time her child, Q, was out of school with no provision. The Council has agreed to make a financial settlement, including reimbursing Mrs P for avoidable expenses and for Q's missed education, and to consider providing respite.

  • Wolverhampton City Council (18 012 150)

    Statement Upheld Disabled children 03-May-2019

    Summary: Mrs X complains the Council was responsible for the decision made by the special school her child attends to temporarily close its after-school club causing distress to her child. We found fault as the communication between the Council and school lacked clarity. But this fault did not cause Mrs X and her child an injustice as the decision to close the club was taken by the school. So, we have completed our investigation.

  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets (18 005 716)

    Statement Not upheld Disabled children 29-Apr-2019

    Summary: Ms X complains the Council delayed making Direct Payments for her son's respite care when they moved into the Council's area. The Ombudsman has found no evidence of fault in the way the Council considered these matters.