Kent County Council (25 016 851)

Category : Children's care services > Disabled children

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr F’s complaint about his application for a Blue Badge for his daughter because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation, and we cannot achieve the outcome Mr F wants.

The complaint

  1. Mr F complains the Council refused his application for a Blue Badge for his daughter.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr F applied for a Blue Badge for his daughter. She has autism spectrum disorder. At the time of his application, Mr F’s daughter was 3.
  2. Mr F’s application and subsequent appeal were unsuccessful.
  3. Unhappy with the outcome, Mr F complained to us.
  4. We do not decide whether the Council should give Mr F’s daughter a Blue Badge. This is the Council’s job. Our role is to check the Council followed relevant legislation, Government guidance and Council policies. We check the Council took account of evidence and its decision-making process was fair. We are not another appeal. We cannot question a Council decision made without fault, no matter how strongly Mr F disagrees.
  5. The Council used a specialist assessor to evaluate Mr F’s application. The assessor met Mr F’s daughter in person. The assessor was satisfied that Mr F’s daughter’s behaviours could be managed by reasonable coping strategies similar to those used by parents of any child of her age.
  6. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr F’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation. We cannot achieve the outcome Mr F wants, so there is no worthwhile outcome achievable.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings