Brighton & Hove City Council (24 022 967)

Category : Children's care services > Disabled children

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 20 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We have upheld this complaint about the Council’s response to the complainant’s request for social care services for her son. The Council has agreed to the Ombudsman’s request to address the matter through the statutory procedure for complaints about children’s social care. This removes the need for us to investigate.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Ms X, complains that the Council is at fault in refusing to provide further social care provision for her son, in addition to that set out in his Education Health and Care plan.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. If there has been fault which has caused significant injustice, or that could cause injustice to others in the future we may suggest a remedy. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1) and 26A(1), as amended)
  2. Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has considered Ms X’s complaint under its corporate complaints procedure. However, the decision about which Ms X complains relates to children’s social care and therefore falls to be considered under the statutory procedure for complaints about children’s services.
  2. If we were to investigate this complaint it is likely we would find fault causing Ms X injustice, in that the Council’s failure to use the statutory procedure has denied her the independent scrutiny the procedure provides.

Back to top

Agreed action

  1. We therefore asked the Council to consider remedying the injustice by, within one month of the date of this decision, inviting Ms X to escalate her complaint to Stage 2 of the statutory procedure, setting out her rights under the procedure and the applicable timescales.
  2. To its credit the Council has agreed to take the action we asked for.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld this complaint. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy to the injustice caused to Ms X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings