Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Kent County Council (20 007 989)

Category : Children's care services > Disabled children

Decision : Not upheld

Decision date : 25 Aug 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr and Mrs X complained the Council took too long to carry out a parent-carer assessment. They also complained about subsequent difficulties with direct payment arrangements. We have discontinued this investigation at Mr and Mrs X’s request because the Council has agreed to consider the matter under its statutory children’s complaints procedure.

The complaint

  1. Mr and Mrs X complain the Council took too long to carry out a parent-carer assessment. They also complain about subsequent difficulties with direct payment arrangements.
  2. They say this has caused significant distress and inconvenience to the family.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We can decide whether to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I spoke to Mrs X and made written enquiries of the Council. Before I considered the Council’s response, Mrs X withdrew the complaint.
  2. Mr and Mrs X and the Council had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

The statutory complaints procedure for complaints about Children’s Services

  1. The Children’s Act 1989 sets out the complaint procedure where a child or young person is unhappy with the actions of Council’s children’s services.
  2. The statutory procedure has three stages. Stage one gives a council chance to resolve a complaint informally. If it cannot do this, then at stage two it must appoint an Investigating Officer (IO) and an Independent Person (IP), who oversees the investigation. The IO produces a report with their findings and the IP produces a report commenting on the investigation. The Council must then respond to that.
  3. If a complainant remains dissatisfied, they can ask for a stage three review. A panel made up of three people independent of the Council hears the review. The panel will consider the grounds for dissatisfaction with the outcome of the stage two investigation and may recommend the Council take further action.

My findings

  1. After I issued my enquiries to the Council, Mrs X contacted me. She said the Council had agreed to include her complaint as part of another, ongoing complaint about related matters already being considered under the statutory procedure.
  2. She confirmed she no longer wanted the Ombudsman to consider her complaint.
  3. The Council has confirmed its agreement to include the matters complained about at stage two of the statutory children’s complaints procedure.
  4. For this reason, I have discontinued this investigation to allow the Council the opportunity to investigate and respond to the complaint.
  5. If Mr and Mrs X are not satisfied with the Council’s final response to the complaint, they can make a new complaint to the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have discontinued this investigation at the request of the complainants.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page