Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (26 017 085)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to progress Mrs X’s complaint through its complaint procedure. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making to warrant our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council refused to progress her complaint about its children’s services through its complaint procedure.
  2. Mrs X said this caused her distress and uncertainty.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained to the Council about its children’s services involvement with her family.
  2. The Council refused to progress the complaint through its complaint procedure because there were ongoing court proceedings, which are closely related to Mrs X’s substantive complaint.
  3. The Council invited Mrs X to raise her complaint after the court proceedings ended.
  4. Mrs X complained because she believed the Council could consider her complaint separately from the court proceedings.
  5. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong.
  6. The Council’s complaint procedure sets out it may refuse a complaint where the matters complained about are subject to legal proceedings.
  7. The available evidence suggests the Council has acted in line with its policy here. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making here to warrant our involvement and so we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings