What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Thurrock Council (25 024 466)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms M’s complaint about her dealings with the Council between 2012 and 2020 because there is no worthwhile outcome achievable.

The complaint

  1. Ms M complains the Council has refused to investigate her complaint. She complained about her dealings with the Council between 2012 and 2020.
  2. Ms M alleged that failures by the Council (and other bodies) in connection with domestic abuse and safeguarding led to the removal of her children in February 2020. She says that failings by the Council restricted her ability to advocate effectively for her children.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council refused to consider Ms M’s complaint because it concerns events that happened more than 12 months ago.
  2. Ms M is unhappy with the Council’s decision. She explained the reasons she had not complained sooner. She said that at the time of the events, she was experiencing domestic abuse, coercive control, and acute vulnerability. She said she was not in a position to pursue a complaint because of fear of repercussions and the imbalance of power inherent in care proceedings.
  3. There does not appear to be any reason the Council could not investigate Ms M’s complaint if it chose to.
  4. But there are a number of reasons we will not pursue the matter.
  5. Ms M’s complaint, and the injustice she claims as a result of the fault she alleges, are closely linked to matters outside our jurisdiction. Ms M’s children were taken into care in 2020. We cannot investigate complaints about the care proceedings or matters which could have been raised with the Court during the proceedings. Ms M, or her legal representatives, could have raised any concerns during the proceedings.
  6. Unconnected recent developments, about which Ms M has made a separate complaint, have further limited her ability to advocate for her children.
  7. Investigating Ms M’s complaint now about events between 2012 and 2020 would not lead to a different outcome.
  8. We will not investigate Ms M’s complaint because there is no worthwhile outcome achievable for us.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms M’s complaint because there is no worthwhile outcome achievable.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings