What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Essex County Council (25 022 887)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to consider her complaint whilst there are ongoing care proceedings. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains about the Council’s decision not to consider her complaint about its handling of her child’s case whilst there are ongoing care proceedings. Miss X says she did not seek to challenge or overturn the court’s decisions and the Council has wrongly refused to consider her complaints about operational practice, safeguarding and maladministration due to the ongoing proceedings.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X complained to the Council about its handling of her child’s case whilst he is a looked-after child.
  2. The Council told Miss X it would not currently consider any part of her complaint because there were ongoing care proceedings. It explained its complaints process cannot run alongside concurrent proceedings and its decision had been made in line with its complaints policy. It advised Miss X she could resubmit her complaint for consideration once the proceedings have concluded.
  3. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint. This is because there is no sign of fault in the Council’s decision not to consider her complaint whilst there are ongoing care proceedings. This is to ensure the proceedings are not put at risk of being prejudiced by a concurrent complaint investigation. It is a decision it has discretion to make, in line with the statutory guidance to councils on the handling of complaints where there are ongoing proceedings. As set out in the Council’s response, it will be open to Miss X to resubmit her complaint to the Council for consideration once the proceedings have concluded.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there is no sign of fault in the Council’s decision not to consider her complaint whilst there are concurrent proceedings.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings