London Borough of Enfield (25 019 894)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 22 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to make a payment to Mrs X after a previous complaint. The Council has acknowledged fault, apologised and agreed to pay an increased amount to Mrs X. I am satisfied with the action the Council intends to take.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council failed to pay her a remedy of £250 it agreed in 2023 as a result of a complaint. She said she was chasing the Council for more than two years. Mrs X said this caused her further distress and inconvenience. She wanted the Council to apologise and send the £250 as well as an additional payment to recognise the further impact of its delay. She also wanted it to make service improvements relating to complaint-handling.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)
  2. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We previously considered a complaint from Mrs X. The Council agreed to make a payment of £250 to her to recognise the injustice caused to her by its fault.
  2. Mrs X complained to us after two years as she says, despite having chased the Council several times, she had not received the payment.
  3. During its consideration of Mrs X’s more recent complaint, the Council acknowledged it had not made the payment. It apologised to Mrs X and increased the amount it would pay to £500 to recognise the additional injustice this caused.
  4. If we investigated this complaint, we would not achieve anything different or more meaningful. The apology and increased payment offered by the Council is a suitable remedy in line with our guidance. It would not be proportionate in this case for us to investigate the matter solely to recommend service improvements, in the absence of any further personal remedy being required for Mrs X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because I am satisfied the Council has offered a suitable remedy to recognise the injustice its delay caused.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings